Making Mechanical Parts Work
As my clockwork spider project develops, one of the goals I’ve had in mind is a final end design that can be assembled by hand, without tools, or additional hardware. 1 This is an ideal to which I hope I can adhere. I just like the idea of printing off a plate of parts, handing them to someone, and letting them assemble all of the bits on the spot. Getting a box of Legos is fun in part because it comes with absolutely everything you need. Without a barrier to assembly, the part out of which the toy is assembled are toys in and of themselves.
If one is to design mechanical parts, I think there are two important considerations. The first consideration is just how close can two objects be designed and printed such that you don’t need too much force to snap them together tightly. If the tolerances are too tight, perhaps the parts can’t be reliably printed or easily fit together by hand. If the tolerance are too loose, the parts won’t stay together. The second consideration is just how much clearance parts need before they can rotate or move against one another smoothly. Too tight and they’ll bind, catch, or seize up. Too loose and they’ll wobble out of place or simply not connect to other critical parts reliably.
After several revisions, I’ve found a “sweet spot” for parts printed with my Thing-O-Matic:
- Interlocking Parts: For a part that needs to fit tightly within another part, I design them so that they have 0.25mm clearance on all sides.
- Moving Parts: For a part that must easily slide within another part, I design them so that they have 0.5mm clearance on all sides.
After some tuning of my profile2 I think I might revise the “moving parts” tolerances to 0.4mm clearance on all sides for a fit with less wibbly wobbly. 3 And if one is to use tools, such as a vise or pliers, and not rely on hand pressure, a clearance of 0.2mm on all sides would probably work for parts that needed to stay locked together.
Do you design mechanical parts that need to fit together? What kinds of tolerances do you use in your designs?
- Photo courtesy of j-ster [↩]
- Again, with Dave’s Profileinator – the only way to tune a profile [↩]
- Or timey wimey. [↩]
| Tagged with | clockwork spider, fit, fitting, interlock, interlocking, mechanical, mechanical parts, resolution, slide, snap, snapping, tolerances | 4 comments |










